The Woolworth Building
233 Broadway, Ste 640
New York, NY 10279
333 East 38th Street
New York, NY 10016
Initial spinal fusion surgery attempts were performed with the placement of posterior lateral (on the side) and posterior (in the back of the spine) bone grafts. With the advent of internal fixation, these spine fusions were performed with the addition of posterior instrumentation (pedicle screws), with fusion rates approaching 80 to 90%.
Surgeons sometimes perform an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in addition to the posterior lateral bone grafting and posterior instrumentation. An ALIF is considered effective due to the large surface area in the front of the spine, as well as studies reporting two thirds of the loads are transmitted through the anterior column (front of the spine). When both an ALIF and a posterior lateral bone grafting and posterior instrumentation are performed it is commonly referred to as a 360-degree spine fusion or a circumferential spine fusion.
Although associated with high spine fusion rates and a high level of patient satisfaction, follow-up radiographs of 360-degree fusions demonstrated inconsistent fusion of the posterior lateral bone mass, suggesting that the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (front of the spine) is the more structural component.
It was theorized that the placement of the anterior graft altered the biomechanics of the spine such that the posterior lateral bone graft did not consolidate. This raises the question: Is there a need for posterior lateral bone graft in the setting of an ALIF with posterior instrumentation?
This question was answered in a prospective randomized study by Schofferman et al. that compared 360-degree fusions versus an ALIF plus posterior instrumentation (270-degree fusions). Their results showed that both procedures were successful in alleviating pain with no clinical differences among the two; however the 270-degree fusions had less blood loss and shorter hospital stays.
Performing a 270-degree spine fusion by traditional surgical techniques requires an open procedure exposing the lamina, pars, facets, and transverse processes of the levels to be instrumented. This approach permits excellent visualization of the spine, and access to the portions of the spine to place the implants. Depending on the spine surgeon's technique, however, the muscle retraction and disruption of the posterior muscles and ligaments may lead to some degree of scar formation and damage. In turn, this is potentially associated with unwanted postoperative effects (sometimes referred to as "fusion disease").
Depending on the spine surgeon's technique and other factors, a traditional open spine fusion procedure may include a risk of:
Since previous studies demonstrated that posterior lateral bone grafting was not necessary for a successful spine fusion surgery, efforts have been made to perform a 270-degree fusion with anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive, percutaneous posterior instrumentation. The hope is that this will allow for a 270-degree spine fusion without the complications potentially associated with open procedures.
Dr. Goldstein also recommends this overview of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
About Dr. Goldstein
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Minimally Invasive Fusion
Theory and MISS
Anterior Approach MISS
Anterior Approach Incision
Lumbar Degenerative Disc
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Dr. Goldstein is recognized as one of the leading spine surgeons in New York. His expertise is sought by television, media, and magazines. His practice is focused on surgical treatment:
Dr. Goldstein serves as Director of the Spine Service at NYU Langone Medical Center Hospital for Joint Diseases.
Patients from around the world travel to New York for the most advanced medical care. New York offers unrivalled facilities, accommodation, and infrastructure.